← Back to Blog

Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source?

About a week ago I was looking at MySQL 5.5.27, and noticed a curious thing. Despite the fact that the new MySQL release contained its usual share of bug fixes, not a single one of them was accompanied with a test case.

Now, let me tell you something about tests. For many years MySQL was using its own testing framework, called mysql-test. The first version was written as early as 1999. Over the years it has accumulated a lot of tests. Tests for new features and regression tests — those that guarantee that a bug, once fixed, will never ever show up again. We had pretty strict policies about it in MySQL AB (and, later, Sun Microsystems) — every new bug fix always had to come with a test case for the bug. And because these tests were always run on many platforms for every push (by the continuous integration tool called Pushbuild — developed in-house by Kristian Nielsen) we were reasonably sure that any bug, once fixed, will stay fixed forever. I’m not with MySQL anymore, but I still cannot imagine that Oracle would weaken that rule. So, it must be something else then.

One of the changes that 5.5.27 brings in an extension to the mysql-test-run script — the driver script of the mysql-test suite — which makes it look for test cases in a new directory. In addition to the usual location (that is, the mysql-test/ directory in the source tree), it will now look for test cases in the internal/mysql-test/ directory. Does this mean that test cases are no longer open source? Oracle did not reply to my question. But indeed, there is evidence that this guess is true. For example, this commit mail shows that new test cases, indeed, go in this “internal” directory, which is not included in the MySQL source distribution.

MySQL test cases were always an important part of the MySQL source tree. They were particularly useful for storage engine developers and for other people extending MySQL, for example, at Facebook, Twitter, and Taobao.  But also for Linux distributions which add their patches to the base MySQL, and even to users, who don’t modify the sources — they still want to confirm that a particular bug was fixed or that their custom-built binary has no obvious flaws.

In May, at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Oakland, Oracle had 7 representatives there, and they promised that Oracle will be more contributor- and distribution-friendly. It is sad to see that instead of that the MySQL source tree is being closed down.

MySQL AB was never very good at building a development community around the product. There weren’t many MySQL developers or contributors to the project outside of MySQL AB, and the company didn’t do much to increase their number. But now Oracle has noticed them — and it intentionally kills whatever is left of the MySQL development community. Without test cases MySQL becomes as opaque to external developers as any piece of closed source software, and only those most experienced and familiar with the MySQL code base will be able to continue working with it.

UPDATE: It’s difficult to find anything more valuable to external developers than test cases. But arguably the revision history is. It groups changes to these millions of lines of source code into change sets, one change set per a distinct feature or a particular bug fix. It allows to see who changed a specific line of code, when, and why. And it seems that Oracle is going to keep this information to itself too. Public MySQL trees on launchpad with the revision history are not being updated.

Now, is there a single successful Open Source project with no developer community at all ?

UPDATE 2: We’re not the only ones this issue affects. See also:

 

Comments

118 responses to “Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source?”

  1. Pedro Larroy Avatar

    Another reason to use postgres then?

    1. Daniel Bartholomew Avatar

      I don’t know about that. 🙂 More of a reason to use MariaDB in my mind.

      1. Czero Avatar
        Czero

        MariaDB relies upon upstream software as much as the next MySQL compatible fork. It’s nothing against MariaDB, but we can’t trust where YOU get YOUR sources from, that inherently breaks the chain of trust.

        1. Daniel Bartholomew Avatar

          Actually no. MariaDB doesn’t rely upon the upstream as much as the next compatible fork. Take a look at: http://montyprogram.com/people/ for a list of the Monty Program people who work on MariaDB. I doubt you’ll find another fork with as much MySQL depth.

          When the MariaDB developers merge in MySQL code they check and evaluate it and don’t just mindlessly apply it. If there’s anything they don’t like it doesn’t get merged and if it’s a good idea but poorly implemented they re-do it, properly. They’ve also added lots of features that you simply won’t find in any MySQL release.

  2. monty Avatar
    monty

    that’s why, we end up using postgres

  3. […] MariaDB blog reports that Oracle has stopped bundling new test cases with the MySQL source. Evidently the revision […]

  4. Pedro Avatar
    Pedro

    Its a consequence of the fork. MariaDB is leaching development without giving back to the propietary project.

    Is it really a surprise? Oracle is pretty straight in their policies, they take of their business without any interest to invest in a community that doesnt make profit for them.

    1. Sergei Avatar
      Sergei

      Two comments: we are giving back, but it is not easy. I, personally, contributed the complete “pluggable authentication” feature to Oracle, and it was not an experience I’d like to repeat.

      And – Oracle is sure within its rights to close-source test cases and not to publish trees on launchpad. Also, I agree that killing a development community provide certain benefits. Short-term.

      But it’s like a restaurant raising prices ten times, so that they could make more profit on every customer. Result? People go eat elsewhere.

  5. Athens Yan Avatar

    Base on license included on MySQL community edition, can we sue Oracle Corp. for license violation?

    1. Sergei Avatar
      Sergei

      No, Oracle has full rights on the code and test cases. Read about dual-licensing of MySQL – Oracle can even close source the complete MySQL code, if they’d wanted to.

      1. Peter Laursen Avatar
        Peter Laursen

        That would cause an immediate response from the European Commission, I think, causing negative effect on Oracle’s business opportunities in Europe. One thing is the license – another the legal guarantees Oracle gave to EU at the time of aquisition of Sun.

        1. arhan Avatar
          arhan

          how’s European Commission involved? A vendor can close source or open source their stuff as the want, why should European Commission care?
          It is the community who cares.

          1. Diederik van der Boor Avatar

            Because the EU had to approve the acquisition of Sun by Oracle. To do so, Oracle had to make promises and keep it clear what direction they’d take. If they break that promise, they broke the approvement and can expect penalties because of it.

        2. Rick Avatar
          Rick

          It’s doubtful that the European Commission would have “an immediate” response because Oracle closed-source MySQL. Your geek values aren’t universally held. Besides it would be a sad state on European politics if they wasted time on something as trivial as that.

        3. Peter Laursen Avatar
          Peter Laursen

          EU cannot decide om Oracle’s business decisions (since Oracle is a US company). But EU (and European governments) can decide on Oracle’s business opportunities and terms in Europe – and if they don’t by themselves I think “somebody” will help them opening their eyes. I don’t think the boundary has been crossed yet – but it is coming close. Oracle gave legal guarantees to to the EU commission that MySQL would continue as Open Soruce. Seizure of Oracle property (but more likely fines in the first place) in Europe is not out of question.

  6. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source? Share this:TwitterFacebookDiggMoreStumbleUponRedditLinkedInEmailPrint Category: KDE, Comments (0) […]

  7. Richard Fussenegger Avatar

    Interesting that even here many people can’t get rid of their fan boy attitudes and keep on posting to do the switch to PostgreSQL. I just hope that you guys keep up developing MariaDB further, even if Oracle is going to shut down the complete MySQL project. I mean, do you guys really need their stuff?

    1. Rein Henrichs Avatar

      Any time a member of one community calls members of another community “fanboys”, everyone is diminished. Shame on you.

      1. Richard Fussenegger Avatar

        It simply is obvious that there are trolls involved if someone calls himself Monty and recommend to use PostgreSQL instead of MySQL based DBS.

        Personally I think only the Oracle DBS is bad, hated to work with it. Although I don’t have many experience with Microsoft DBS. PostgreSQL is definitely a very good DBS and the best fact is, that it’s really fully open source. But statistics still give MySQL more market share (ref. W³Techs and Google Trends). MySQL and PostgreSQL are loosing ground because of the many *new* stuff popping up (e.g. Redis, MongoDB).

  8. […] último ha vuelto a salir a la palestra al desaparecer de la última versión los populares ‘test cases’ muy usados entre desarrolladores y otras partes […]

  9. asdasdfgfsfadf Avatar
    asdasdfgfsfadf

    Do we really need a RDBMS?
    I always wondered how KDE software use a RDBMS, I’d say a noSQL database would be lighter and more appropriate to applications’ uses.

    Even in web development, mysql is being used only because it’s practically a standard, not because the application need its feature.

  10. kindaian Avatar
    kindaian

    Time to move to mariaDB then… or postgres if you feel like it.

  11. Jean-Christophe Petit Avatar
    Jean-Christophe Petit

    Bug #65831 (http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65831) was marked as a duplicate of bug #65740 (65740 is private and crossed out..)

  12. […] MariaDB и других связанных с MySQL проектов выразили опасение в связи с прекращением публикации некоторых […]

  13. fcassia Avatar
    fcassia

    would you like some cheese with your whine?. Come on… you´re on the business of getting more people to use MariaDB and the best way you find to attract people to your project is to trash “evil” Oracle? By your own admission Oracle MySQL is STILL available under an open source GPL “community version”. That is what you downloaded right?. It´s still available at this URL http://www.mysql.com/products/community/ So how the fuck does the lack of test cases makes it less open?. Surely Oracle wants to keep details about internal fixes for corporate clients in a separate internal directory.

    You should learn from the past mistakes of the Libreoffice forkers, in Shuttleworth´s words http://ho.io/libreoffice

    1. TrollWatcher Avatar
      TrollWatcher

      The amount of toxic trolling you do for Oracle in so many projects you could easily be in their employment, like Florian Mueller is. You twist the truth, ignore realities (do you tell ALL projects that test cases should be kept private?), swear at people and put them down. I hope they are paying you well to be their pet sociopath.

      1. fcassia Avatar
        fcassia

        I congratulate trollwatcher for doing some research on my person, and finding out I´ve written positively about Oracle´s funding of Sun´s former open source projects. Congratulations! it means you can use Google. But, you fucked it by being an anonymous weasel. In any case, I take this attack as coming from the project admin weasels.

        I saw this coming, the moment some advocates of the LibreOffice freaking forkers said “next, MySQL!”. Unfortunately I didn´t save a screenshot of the Twitter screen at the time. Obviously there´s a concerted effort by Oracle´s competitors to derail every FOSS project handled by the firm and wrestle control of them, painting this image of an Evil Corporation while saying NOTHING for instance about Novell´s deals with Microsoft, RedHat´s efforts to hide patches
        http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2011/03/04/red_hat_twarts_oracle_and_novell_with_change_to_source_code_packaging/

        Clearly there´s two standards being applied here, and Oracle is always to blame, while others that apply the same methods get a free pass.

        Finally, I´m saddened to disappoint you no money has exchanged hands between any US corp and me. In fact, 90% of the times I sent complaints or suggestions to ORCL guys about Java, those went unanswered. They´re not as open as the Sun guys were.

        And when they did, they referred me to their PR person.

        FC
        PS: MySQL is dual-licensed, if you are against dual-licensing should start a campaign against it. Dual licensing is what allows this (and any other firm using dual-licensing)… to release critical patches for their paying customers first, while those being incorporated in the gpl release at a later date. That´s called a sales incentive.

        1. ProudAnonymous Avatar
          ProudAnonymous

          ”
          Obviously there´s a concerted effort by Oracle´s competitors to derail every FOSS project handled by the firm and wrestle control of them, painting this image of an Evil Corporation while saying NOTHING for instance about Novell´s deals with Microsoft, RedHat´s efforts to hide patches ”

          Are you so self-absorb, so hell-bent on avoiding any responsibility and accountability, that you use the oldest excuse in the books: THE OTHERS DO IT TOO!

          Never mind that the responsibility for the derailment of those projects was Oracle itself, never mind that Novell and Red Hat’s transgressions were debated to death. Never mind that both of those companies have shown to be good stewards of open source projects for a long, long time. Something that Oracle is incapable of doing!

          Giving your face and real name never stop anyone from behaving in a dishonorable manner, just look at yourself!

          You’re a pathetic excuse for a human being.

          You don’t even know the difference between an accent and apostrophe. Sad!

        2. Bill Avatar
          Bill

          Man, don’t say anything about Red Hat you don’t know. You can’t compare Red Hat patch obfuscation with closed source. Look, RH can obfuscate, but the source is still open. There’s two different things on what RH does and what Oracle is doing.

    2. Jos Poortvliet Avatar

      open testcases don’t matter much, open development does. That’s the point being made here – Oracle is making tiny steps in the direction of closing development. The fact that something happens to be GPL doesn’t make it an open project in itself.

      In terms of what you should depend on as company, the picking order is like this:
      Best: open code (gpl/bsd/etc), open development
      Not too horrible: open code (gpl/bsd/etc), closed development
      Bad: closed code, closed development

      Oracle is moving MySQL from Best to Not too horrible. That’s noteworthy for anyone using it and depending on it.

    3. ProudAnonymous Avatar
      ProudAnonymous

      That’s the best that you could come up with? An highlighted passage from more than 12 months ago from the king of trolls?

      You don’t know the meaning of responsibility. Reflect… maybe…

  14. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  15. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  16. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  17. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  18. […] a lo largo de diversos foros en toda Internet, aunque la exposición principal la encontramos en el blog de MariaDB, base de datos derivada de la misma MySQL, también del mismo […]

  19. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  20. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  21. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  22. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  23. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  24. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  25. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  26. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  27. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  28. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  29. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  30. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  31. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  32. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  33. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  34. […] MariaDB и других связанных с MySQL проектов выразили опасение в связи с прекращением публикации некоторых […]

  35. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  36. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  37. […] MariaDB и других связанных с MySQL проектов выразили опасение в связи с прекращением публикации некоторых […]

  38. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  39. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  40. […] на хората от MariaDB в случая е заради скриването в последната версия на MySQL (с която те периодично се синхронизират в името […]

  41. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  42. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  43. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  44. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  45. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test […]

  46. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  47. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  48. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  49. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  50. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  51. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source? […]

  52. […] het blog van MariaDB schrijft ontwikkelaar Sergei Golubchik dat in de broncode van MySQL 5.5.27 een aantal […]

  53. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  54. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  55. […] MariaDB и других связанных с MySQL проектов выразили опасение в связи с прекращением публикации некоторых […]

  56. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  57. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  58. […] uneasy knowing Oracle has a way of killing everything that isn’t Oracle. Seems like that time has finally come. Thankfully there are some forks of MySQL already. It might be time to start reading up and making […]

  59. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  60. […] — 김용성 (@maddiekorea) 8월 19, 2012 Oracle이 MySQL의 소스 코드를 닫고 있다: 새로 추가되는 테스트 소스 코드를 공개 코드 저장소에 공개하지 않고, 모든 커밋 히스토리를 하나로 묶어서 제공. 오라클 정말 가지가지 하는구나. blog.mariadb.org/disappearing-t… […]

  61. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source? « The MariaDB Blog. […]

  62. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  63. […] Petrunia schreibt im MariaDB-Blog, dass Oracle seit neuestem keine Tests, die die Beseitigung von Fehlern überprüfen, mehr […]

  64. […] un citu ar MySQL saistīto projektu dalībnieki izteikuši bažas par to, ka ir pārtraukta svarīgu komponentu koda publiskošana. MySQL pakāpeniski […]

  65. […] to a MariaDB blog, the test cases that comes with MySQL bug fixes are no longer made available by Oracle. The test […]

  66. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  67. […] wirft Sergei Golubchik, ein MariaDB-Entwickler, Oracle vor, dass normalerweise öffentich zugängliche Test-Routinen für […]

  68. […] 根据MariaDB上的一个帖子,MySQL自1999年以来就使用一种名为mysql-test的测试框架。多年来新功能都会经过测试,并通过回归测试确保bug被彻底修复。来自Facebook和Twitter的开发者们都是用这个测试框架。在Twitter,MySQL担负着“大多数Twitter数据的支撑存储技术,包括图谱、时间线、用户数据和推文内容。” […]

  69. […] MariaDBへの投稿によると、MySQLは1999年からmysql-testというテスティング・フレームワークを使っている。長年にわたり新機能および回帰テスト向けにテストケースが作られ、バグ修正が完全であることを保証していた。FacebookやTwitterなどのデベロッパーもこのテスティング・フレームワークに頼っている。Twitterでは、MySQLが「関心グラフ、タイムライン、ユーザーデータ、およびツイートそのものなどTwitterの殆どのデータを支える永続的ストレージ技術」である。 […]

  70. […] lo largo de diversos foros en toda Internet, aunque la exposición principal la encontramos en el blog de MariaDB, base de datos derivada de la misma MySQL, también del mismo […]

  71. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  72. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  73. […] mais amplo a partir de uma base não comercial” (fonte)Leia mais informações este assunto aquiQuer continuar por dentro das novidades do Blog Seja Livre? Siga o nosso perfil no TWITTER, curta a […]

  74. […] un mensaje de blog, Sergei Golubchik, de MariaDB, apunta que Oracle ha empezado a guardarse información que antes era […]

  75. […] big news this week was the reports by Ronald Bradford (consultant), Sergei Golubchik (MariaDB) and Mark Callaghan (Facebook) that Oracle has yet again tightened the screws a little bit. This was […]

  76. […] un mensaje de blog, Sergei Golubchik, de MariaDB, mencionó que Oracle ha empezado a guardarse información que antes era pública, asegurando que […]

  77. […] un mensaje de blog, Sergei Golubchik, de MariaDB, mencionó que Oracle ha empezado a guardarse información que antes era pública, asegurando que […]

  78. […] un mensaje de blog, Sergei Golubchik, de MariaDB, mencionó que Oracle ha empezado a guardarse información que antes era pública, asegurando que […]

  79. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  80. […] of hiding MySQL test cases and obfuscating revision history byMariaDB VP Sergei Golubchik. In a blog post entitled “Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL become closed source”, […]

  81. […] Da questo punto di vista è istruttivo anche quello che sta succedendo a MySQL: risulta infatti che Oracle stia lentamente omettendo i test di unità dagli ultimi aggiornamenti del… […]

  82. […] number of responses to the MariaDB community discussion on the subject of the disappearing test cases simply find people migrating to MariaDB or PostgresSQL. Most Oracle […]

  83. […] Tudo andava bem, até que a Oracle comprou a Sun Microsystems em 2009. Não é segredo que nunca fui fã da Oracle, e considerando os acontecimentos recentes com o Java e o OpenOffice, não demoraria muito para o MySQL também receber seu toque de Midas da escrotização. […]

  84. […] Tudo andava bem, até que a Oracle comprou a Sun Microsystems em 2009. Não é segredo que nunca fui fã da Oracle, e considerando os acontecimentos recentes com o Java e o OpenOffice, não demoraria muito para o MySQL também receber seu toque de Midas da escrotização. […]

  85. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  86. […] de revisiones por parte del vicepresidente de MariaDB (un fork de MySQL), Sergei Golubchik. En un artículo en su blog, Golubchik indica que aunque en la última versión de MySQL se indican correcciones para algunos […]

  87. […] de revisiones por parte del vicepresidente de MariaDB (un fork de MySQL), Sergei Golubchik. En un artículo en su blog, Golubchik indica que aunque en la última versión de MySQL se indican correcciones para algunos […]

  88. […] un men­sa­je de blog, Ser­gei Go­lub­chik, de Ma­riaDB, apun­ta que Ora­cle ha em­pe­za­do a guar­dar­se […]

  89. […] Dwa artykuły jasno wyjaśniające dlaczego powinno uciekać się z Oracle MySQL i dlaczego spodziewam się nowych użytkowników MariaDB w Archu. […]

  90. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  91. […] 根据MariaDB上的一个帖子,MySQL自1999年以来就使用一种名为mysql-test的测试框架。多年来新功能都会经过测试,并通过回归测试确保bug被彻底修复。来自Facebook和Twitter的开发者们都是用这个测试框架。在Twitter,MySQL担负着“大多数Twitter数据的支撑存储技术,包括图谱、时间线、用户数据和推文内容。” […]

  92. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become …Aug 17, 2012 … MySQL test cases were always an important part of the MySQL source tree. They were particularly useful for storage engine developers and for … […]

  93. […] to a post on MariaDB, MySQL has used a testing framework called mysql-test since 1999. Over the years tests have been […]

  94. […] also accused Oracle of obfuscating on security and bug fixes, as it has not released all-important test cases for MySQL […]

  95. […] that might help to understand the problem, it takes hours to map them to code changes. Heck, even test cases are kept private now. This seriously smells Security through Obscurity to […]

  96. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become …Aug 17, 2012 … I don’t think the boundary has been crossed yet – but it is coming close. Oracle gave legal guarantees to to the EU commission that MySQL … […]

  97. […] Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source? […]

  98. […] According to Widenius, MariaDB is faster, more secure and has more features than MySQL. Sergei Golubchik, MariaDB’s VP of architecture, also argues that Oracle is slowing turning MySQL into a closed source program. […]